MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7125602255 · doi:10.18280/jesa.581219

Control and Energy Management of Hybrid Renewable DC Microgrid by Using Flatness Method with Predictive Neural Network and Fuzzy PI Regulation

2025· article· W7125602255 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Lina Daoudi, Amel Ourici, Sihem Ghoudelbourk

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal Européen des Systèmes Automatisés · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrogrid Control and Optimization
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicrogridControl theory (sociology)Flatness (cosmology)Artificial neural networkFuzzy logicEnergy managementFuzzy control system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article proposes a flatness-based control for a renewable hybrid microgrid comprising a photovoltaic (PV), wind turbine (WT), and battery storage systems.The flatness approach generates reference trajectories for DC-link energy voltage regulation and coordinated power sharing.To increase robustness under renewable intermittency and improve reference-trajectory tracking, the proposed control law is augmented by incorporating a predictive neural network (PNN).In addition, a Fuzzy-PI controller is used in the inner converter loops, where fuzzy logic adaptively tunes the PI parameters in realtime based on the error and its variation.A maximum power point tracking (MPPT) technique based on a perturb and observe (PO) was used to maximize the PV's power.The proposed system was tested in a simulation environment based on MATLAB/Simulink.The obtained results show that the proposed strategy ensures efficient energy management in hybrid microgrids, decreases perturbations in the regulated DC bus, and improves robustness against load variation uncertainties.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.839
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal Européen des Systèmes AutomatisésSame topicMicrogrid Control and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207