MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Transformer-Augmented TCN for Modeling Complex Patterns in Retail Sales Data

2025· article· W7125609289 on OpenAlexaff
Md Robiuddin, Muhammad Iftekher Chowdhury, Quazi Abidur Rahman

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicForecasting Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsWestern UniversityTrent University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDemand forecastingTime seriesArchitectureArtificial neural networkAutoregressive integrated moving averageOrder (exchange)Sales forecastingProfiling (computer programming)Data modeling

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Today's fast-changing economy makes retail highly competitive. To stay profitable and relevant, retailers need to predict customer demand accurately. Reliable sales predictions enable retailers to manage inventory efficiently, adapt swiftly to market dynamics, and maximize revenues. While traditional statistical models such as SARIMA offer reasonable forecasts, they often struggle to capture complex patterns driven by promotional events or seasonal variability. To address these limitations, prior research has commonly employed hybrid architectures like TCN-LSTM. In this work, we propose a novel hybrid neural network architecture that augments Temporal Convolutional Networks (TCNs) with Transformer encoder blocks. The TCN layer is adept at capturing short-term dependencies like weekly sales fluctuations, while the Transformer module excels in modeling long-range relationships and global trends in time series forecasting. We evaluate the proposed TCN-Transformer model against strong baselines, including TCN-LSTM, TST, and SARIMA, to assess its forecasting effectiveness. We collaborated with Instacart and analyzed delivery order data from one of their partner retailers, which includes more than 9 million anonymized orders collected over a two-year period. This large-scale, real-world dataset enabled rigorous testing of model performance under diverse market conditions. To ensure robust results, all experiments were repeated seven times, and the reported metrics represent the average across these independent runs. Our experiments demonstrate that the proposed TCN-Transformer architecture achieves superior forecasting accuracy for a 7-day forecast horizon. Evaluated on real-world retail data throughout 2024, the TCN-Transformer model outperformed all baselines in 11 out of 12 months. The yearly Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) for the TCNTransformer was 9.94 %, compared to 11.41 % for TCN-LSTM, 13.40 % for TST, and 12.91 % for SARIMA. These results position the proposed TCN-Transformer architecture as a highly effective solution for real-world retail sales forecasting.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.061

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.520
GPT teacher head0.480
Teacher spread0.040 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicForecasting Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207