MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7125648803 · doi:10.17759/cpp.2025330407

Communication dysfunctions in the parental family as a factor in eating disorders and emotional self-regulation in adults suffering from obesity

2025· article· W7125648803 on OpenAlex
E. D. Flitman, A.B. Kholmogorova, OV Vasyukova, L.N. Yakubova

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCounseling Psychology and Psychotherapy · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldPsychology
TopicEating Disorders and Behaviors
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAlexithymiaObesityEating disordersEmotional eatingToronto Alexithymia ScaleDepression (economics)Coping (psychology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<p><strong>Context and relevance.</strong> Obesity is a non—communicable epidemic of the 21st century, gaining momentum among both children and adults in all countries. Studying the social and psychological factors of obesity is one of the key ways to increase the effectiveness of obesity prevention and treatment. <strong>Goal.</strong> To evaluate the influence of communicative dysfunctions in the parental family of obese patients on the formation of eating disorders. <strong>Hypothesis.</strong> Communicative dysfunctions in the parental family contribute to the emergence of emotional eating disorders as a strategy for coping with stress. <strong>Methods and materials.</strong> The study involved 38 patients aged 18 to 59 years (M = 33,4; SD = 12,3) with an established diagnosis of obesity (BMI from 30,0 to 55,5, M = 37,4, SD = 7,2), 24 of them were women, 14 were men. The following methods were used in the study: The Family Emotional Communication Questionnaire (SEC; A.B. Kholmogorova, S.V. Volikova, M.G.Sorokova, 2016); The Dutch Eating Behavior Questionnaire (DEBQ, T. van Strien, 1986); The Beck Depression Inventory (BDI, A. T. Beck, 1961); The Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20, G. J. Taylor, 1985) and a diagnostic interview with respondents. <strong>Results.</strong> The results confirmed the hypothesis of the tendency of obese patients to an emotionogenic type of eating disorders and the contribution of communicative dysfunctions in the family to these disorders. High rates of depressive symptoms were recorded, as well as obese respondents having problems recognizing their own feelings<strong>. Conclusions.</strong> It is shown that it is necessary to further study the family factors of eating disorders according to the emotionogenic type, which can contribute to the prevention of obesity through psychotherapy of parents, teachers and health professionals, as well as to improve comprehensive programs of care for obese patients and their families.</p>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.052
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.311 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it