Thereus genena
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Wing Pattern Identification Key for Males of the Thereus genena species group 1. DFW with scent patch only.............................................................. T. aguacatal sp. nov. – DFW with scent pad and with or without scent patch.......................................................... 2 2. DFW with scent pad and scent patch.............................................. ......................... 3 – DFW with scent pad only............................................................................... 4 3. DFW triangular scent patch........................................................................ T. tiasa – DFW rounded scent patch............................................................................... 5 4. DHW blue scales filling more than half of cell Rs-M 1............................. ............................ 6 – DHW with no blue scales in cell Rs-M 1 or only a few at base............................................... ..... 7 5. DFW scent patch filling more than one third of discal cell..................................................... 8 – DFW scent patch filling less than the distal quarter of the disc cell............................................... 9 6. DFW blue violet very extensive with reduced brown apex......................................... T. cacao sp. nov. – DFW blue less extensive toward the apex................................. ................................. 10 7. DFW blue grey, VHW postmedian line with an important gap in M 1....................................... T. endera – DFW bluer, VHW postmedian line with a small gap in M 1 ..................................................... 11 8. DFW scent patch filling the distal half of the discal cell................................... ... T. chontachaca sp. nov. – DFW scent patch filling more than half of the discal cell........... ........................................... 12 9. DFW blue very extensive with reduced brown apex......................................................... 13 – DFW blue less extensive with larger brown apex and outer margin................................. ............. 14 10. DFW blue not completely surrounding the scent pad, VHW with only a few red-orange scales between anal and cubital spots...................................................................................... T. antecum sp. nov. – DFW blue surrounding the scent pad, VHW with red-orange scales between anal and cubital spots..... .. T. geminus sp. nov. 11. VHW postmedian line not in contact with red-orange cubital spot in CuA 1 -CuA 2, only a few red-orange scales between anal and cubital red spots.................. ...................................................... T. angulus stat. rev. – VHW postmedian line in contact with huge red-orange cubital spot in CuA 1 -CuA 2, red-orange scales between anal and cubital spots.......................... ............................................................... T. genena 12. DFW scent patch filling more than half of the discal cell, oval scent pad half smaller than scent patch.... T. ramirezi sp. nov. – DFW scent patch filling the distal three-quarters of the cell, rounded scent pad reaching M 3, VHW postmedian line straight...................................................................................... T. borbaensis sp. nov. 13. DFW tear-shaped scent patch, adjacent to a smaller crescent-shaped scent pad, DHW red cubital spot not in contact with the postmedian line in CuA 1 -CuA 2 .......................................................... T. ortaloides stat. rev. – DFW oval scent patch, adjacent to a half smaller oval scent pad, DHW red cubital spot in contact with the postmedian line in CuA 1 -CuA 2.......................................................................... T. praxioides sp. nov. 14. DFW oval scent patch........................................................................... T. ortalus – DFW flattened oval scent patch..................................... ..................................... 15 15. DFW scent patch adjacent to an oval scent pad of similar size............ ................................. T. praxis – DFW scent patch adjacent to a smaller rounded scent pad....................................... T. confusus sp. nov. ......continued on the next page Species accounts An updated systematic list of all taxa in the genena species group is presented here: Thereus endera (Hewitson, 1867) -- thestia (Hewitson, 1867) Thereus geminus Faynel & Fåhraeus sp. nov. Thereus cacao Faynel & Fåhraeus sp. nov. Thereus antecum Faynel & Fåhraeus sp. nov. Thereus genena (Hewitson, 1867) Thereus tiasa (Hewitson, 1869) -- buris (H.H. Druce, 1907) Thereus angulus (Le Crom & K. Johnson, 1997) stat. rev. Thereus borbaensis Faynel, O’Brien & Fåhraeus sp. nov. Thereus chontachaca Faynel, Fåhraeus & González-Mercado sp. nov. Thereus ramirezi Faynel, Huertas & Fåhraeus sp. nov. Thereus ortaloides (Lathy, 1930) stat. rev. Thereus confusus Faynel & Fåhraeus sp. nov. Thereus praxioides Faynel & Fåhraeus sp. nov. Thereus praxis (Godman & Salvin, 1887) Thereus ortalus (Godman & Salvin, 1887) Thereus aguacatal Faynel, Le Crom & Fåhraeus sp. nov. Among the genena species group, there are two sets of species that can be separated by the shape and position of their brush organs in the male genitalia, which also results in a separation in the phylogenetic tree (Fig. 1). The first one includes: T. endera, T. geminus sp. nov., T. cacao sp. nov., T. antecum sp. nov., T. genena, T. tiasa, T. angulus stat. rev., T. borbaensis sp. nov., T. chontachaca sp. nov., T. ramirezi sp. nov. All these species have dorsal brush organs attached to spatula-shaped processes located dorsally, in the middle of the fused tegumen/vinculum (Fig. 78 left, black arrow) and lateral ones shorter and pointed in the direction of the valvae tips (Fig. 78 left, red arrow). In this group, the eighth tergite is subrectangular (Fig. 79, left). Then there is a second set of species, including: T. ortaloides stat. rev., T. confusus sp. nov., T. praxioides sp. nov., T. praxis, T. ortalus, having huge dorsal brush organs (Fig. 78 right, black arrow) attached very close to the saccus to a dorsal triangular extension of the vinculum with a bowl-shaped base (Fig. 60, left arrow). The genital ring appears consequently more rectangular in ventral view. Another pair of brush organs is located ventrally (not laterally like previously), longer but less wide than in the previous set of species and oriented toward the gnathos and not the valvae. These hairs are implanted in a receptacle, which is a small deformation of the posterior part of the saccus (Fig. 78 left, red arrow), more visible in lateral view (Fig. 60, right arrow). The eighth tergite is longer with a W-shaped anterior border (Fig. 79, right). T. aguacatal sp. nov. is included in the second group in the ML tree but it has dorsal brush organs similar to the first set of species and ventrals ones turned towards the gnathos like the second one (Fig. 65).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.042 | 0.018 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".