MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7125694126 · doi:10.3929/ethz-c-000790801

Retrieval of aerosol properties from aerosol optical depth measurements with high temporal resolution and spectral range

2025· other· en· W7125694126 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Angelos Karanikolas, Benjamin Torres, Masahiro Momoi, Marcos Herreras Giralda, Natalia Kouremeti, Jülian Gröbner, Lionel Doppler, Stelios Kazadzis

Bibliographic record

VenueRepository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich) · 2025
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAerosolAERONETRadianceSun photometerEffective radiusSingle-scattering albedoRadiometerRadiative transferSkyAngstrom exponent

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Several sun photometer networks worldwide include instruments for aerosol optical depth (AOD) observations, such as Global Atmospheric Atmosphere Watch-Precision Filter Radiometer (GAW-PFR) and Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET). AERONET provides additional aerosol properties such as the detailed volume size distribution and the single scattering albedo through inversion modelling of sky radiance measurements. However, the data availability for such properties is limited due to the limited number of daily almucantar sky radiance scans and cloudiness. AOD is measured significantly more frequently as there can be one measurement even every minute. Also, the AOD measurements are affected only by clouds being too close or covering the solar disk. The Generalized Retrieval of Atmosphere and Surface Properties (GRASP) is a flexible inversion model to retrieve aerosol properties from various observations. One of its capabilities is the retrieval of the volume concentration, the volume median radius and geometric standard deviation for each aerosol size distribution mode and the separation of AOD to each mode using only spectral AOD as an input parameter (known as the GRASP-AOD application). Such properties are important for various applications, as the size of aerosols affects their interaction with solar radiation, clouds and radiative forcing modelling. Particle size also shows significant differences depending on the aerosol type such as dust or biomass burning. In this study, we selected four common stations of GAW-PFR and AERONET, used GRASP to retrieve the bimodal size distribution parameters from AOD measured by GAW-PFR instruments (PFRs) and validated the results for different conditions using AERONET data as reference. One of those sites includes a multi-year parallel timeseries from two different BTS spectroradiometers that combined can provide direct spectral irradiance (and as a result AOD) in the 300-2150 nm range. Using this dataset, we were able to investigate the effect and potential benefits of the increased spectral range on GRASP-AOD retrievals. This is mostly focused on the retrieval of the coarse mode volume median radius, which is particularly challenging with the filter radiometers measuring up to 862 or 1020 nm. We also assessed the performance for certain dust and biomass burning cases. Our results showed good agreement between PFR AOD-based and AERONET sky radiance inversions for AOD modal separation and volume concentrations. Significant improvement of the PFR-AERONET intercomparison was also possible for the fine mode volume and effective radius when restricting the datasets to AOD at 500 nm > 0.1 and & Aring;ngstr & ouml;m Exponent (AE) > 1. Also, the results showed consistency with previous study regarding the validation of such retrievals using AERONET AOD. Focusing on conditions with high proportion of dust particles, we found consistent results with the general cases Using AOD with a larger spectral range (from BTS spectroradiometer), we found that the wavelength selection may affect the results and that using longer wavelengths can increase the sensitivity of coarse mode volume median radius to AOD and improve the correlation of the GRASP BTS AOD-based and AERONET datasets. However, the available data were limited, so it is not clear under what conditions the inclusion of such wavelengths will result in more accurate retrievals or to what extent.Finally, we were able to reproduce with GRASP the aerosol size characteristics of unusual biomass burning cases from the Canadian wildfires during 2023, but the results showed systematically increased fine mode radius and concentration compared to the AERONET output.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.324
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.188
GPT teacher head0.358
Teacher spread0.170 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRepository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich)French-language works237,207