Louis Gruel, Olivier Galland et Guillaume Houzel (dir.), 2009 , Les étudiants en France , Rennes, PUR, 427 pages
Bibliographic record
Abstract
RésuméCet article aborde les transformations récentes survenues dans le paysage de la confessionnalité scolaire au Québec sous l’angle de la place dévolue à la religion dans l’éducation scolaire. Après avoir dressé un portrait des étapes légales et politiques ayant mené à la nouvelle configuration laïque des rapports entre religions et école, l’auteur précise comment la synthèse des débats sociaux a été modelée dans un discours pédagogique faisant de la religion une des facettes de l’éducation à la citoyenneté. En analysant en particulier la compétence en culture religieuse du programme d’éthique et culture religieuse (ECR), l’article met toutefois au jour certains glissements entre les intentions énoncées dans le programme et leur traduction en contenus de formation, où se chevauchent deux conceptions de la démocratie et des droits fondamentaux.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.030 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".