MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7125761587

Structural and functional connectivity in tau mutation carriers: from presymptomatic to symptomatic frontotemporal dementia

2024· article· en· W7125761587 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueDZNE Pub · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAlzheimer's disease research and treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research CentreInstituto de Salud Carlos IIIMedical Research CouncilCanada First Research Excellence FundAssociation pour la Recherche sur la Sclérose Latérale Amyotrophique et autres Maladies du MotoneuroneVetenskapsrådetFondation pour la Recherche sur AlzheimerMinistero della SaluteWeston Brain InstituteKarolinska InstitutetZonMwBrain Research UKMcGill UniversityDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftUniversity College LondonWellcome TrustAgence Nationale de la RechercheStichting DioraphteUniversity of CambridgeCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchFondation Vaincre AlzheimerBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchAlzheimer NederlandEU Joint Programme – Neurodegenerative Disease Research
KeywordsFrontotemporal dementiaMutationFunctional connectivityDiseaseDementiaAlzheimer's disease
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: Microtubule-associated protein tau (MAPT) mutations cause frontotemporal dementia (FTD), characterised by behavioural, language, and motor impairments due to brain connectivity disruptions. We investigated structural and functional connectivity in 86 mutation carriers and 272 controls to map connectivity changes at different disease stages. METHODS: The CDR Dementia Staging Instrument plus National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center (NACC) Behaviour and Language domains (CDR plus NACC FTLD) stratified carriers into three groups: asymptomatic, prodromal, and symptomatic. We extracted measures of cortical thickness, white matter integrity, and functional connectivity, which were compared between each carrier group and controls using linear mixed models. RESULTS: Early isolated functional disruptions in salience/visual networks were present in asymptomatic carriers, along with anterior cingulate gray matter reductions. In prodromal carriers, functional changes extended to other networks, with additional structural damage in temporal poles/cingulate. DISCUSSION: This study shows that functional networks likely drive lifelong compensation for a genetically determined disease, manifesting clinically when structural damage reaches a critical threshold. This supports connectivity measures as potential biomarkers for MAPT-related neurodegeneration. HIGHLIGHTS: Our findings reveal the progressive and staged nature of structural and functional connectivity alterations in MAPT mutation carriers, with distinct patterns at each disease stage. In asymptomatic carriers, we identified early functional connectivity alterations in salience and visual networks, despite preserved white matter and only subtle gray matter atrophy. These appear to represent both response to pathology and possible compensatory mechanisms. In prodromal carriers, functional connectivity alterations were accompanied by structural damage, including cortical atrophy and white matter tract disruptions, in regions directly connected to early-affected networks. The sequential progression, from functional connectivity changes to structural degeneration, aligns with the hypothesis that tau propagates along axonal connections, disrupting neural network integrity before measurable atrophy occurs. We propose a theoretical data-driven model of biomarker evolution in MAPT mutation carriers, highlighting functional disruptions as early indicators and structural damage as a later-stage hallmark. These connectivity biomarkers have the potential to inform therapeutic strategies and clinical trial design.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDZNE Pub→Same topicAlzheimer's disease research and treatments→French-language works237,207→