MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Novel Deep Learning Approach for Enhanced Ischemic Brain Stroke Detection from CT Images Using Deep Feature Extraction and Optimized Feature Selection

2025· article· W7125775913 on OpenAlexaff
Ahmad Abumihsan, Majdi Owda, Amani Yousef Owda, Fathi Gasir, Mobarak Abumohsen, Lampros Stergioulas

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldNeuroscience
TopicBrain Tumor Detection and Classification
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiscriminative modelDeep learningPattern recognition (psychology)Feature selectionStroke (engine)Feature extractionIschemic strokeOcclusion

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ischemic brain stroke is the most prevalent type of stroke caused by the occlusion of blood vessels via thrombi or blockages and is the second most common cause of mortality globally, after ischemic heart disease. To improve patient outcomes, ischemic stroke must be diagnosed timely and precise. This paper introduces a novel approach toward ischemic stroke detection from computed tomography (CT) images by integrating deep learning and optimization techniques for feature extraction and selection. The VGG16 model is utilized to extract high-dimensional spatially rich features that efficaciously capture the intricate texture and spatial patterns within the CT scans. To optimize these features, a genetic algorithm (GA) is leveraged to select the most discriminative subset and reduce redundancy. The new method was developed and evaluated on a unique, first-hand dataset gathered from a specialized private hospital in Palestine. The findings show that the suggested combined technique VGG16-GA highly enhances the performance of all classifiers. Notably, the VGG16-GA-XGB model attained superior outcomes, with an accuracy of 98.89%, precision of 98.85%, recall of 98.93%, and an F1-score of 98.92%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.740
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicBrain Tumor Detection and ClassificationFrench-language works237,207