Comprendre le processus de décrochage précoce des enseignants pour mieux le prévenir
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article examine le processus d’abandon de l’enseignement en début de carrière, à partir de l’intention de quitter et de l’incertitude quant à sa poursuite. Les données ont été collectées au Québec, au moyen d’un questionnaire administré en 2023 (n = 730) et d’entrevues réalisées en 2024-2025 (n = 42) auprès d’enseignants qui sont dans leurs premières années d’enseignement. Les résultats indiquent que l’intention de quitter la profession ne relève pas d’un manque de vocation, mais principalement de facteurs systémiques qui engendrent un stress chronique, un sentiment d’impuissance, une perte de sens du travail et un découragement. Une revitalisation des fondements du métier d’enseignant et une amélioration continue des conditions d’entrée et de travail s’avèrent indispensables.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.018 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".