MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Single Accordion Origami Structure for Harvesting Wave Energy

2025· article· W7125899510 on OpenAlex
Ruihao Zhang

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicWave and Wind Energy Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPython (programming language)AccordionRenewable energyVolume (thermodynamics)Kinetic energyElectricityTopology (electrical circuits)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper analyzes the Single Accordion Structure (SAS) mathematically using a model both geometrically and volumetrically. The SAS offers a promising approach for producing renewable electricity by applying energy from ocean waves to drive air turbines. This will help supplement the diversity of renewable energy sources and help curb global warming. First, we formulate the problem of enclosing the air volume with as many solid panels as possible. A Python program is written to resolve the geometry of the structure numerically. A kinetic model is used to represent the structure and vector equations are proposed and expressed using Python code. Next, the resulting air volume is expressed as a function of a single state variable, enabling straightforward optimization of the device's energy-capture performance and a basis for other future uses.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.887
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicWave and Wind Energy SystemsFrench-language works237,207