MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Gaussian Splatting in the AI Era: A Survey

2025· article· W7125900366 on OpenAlexaff
Shuaitao Fan, Lu Zeng, Lunning Zhang, Wenhe Chen, Zhenhua Pan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldComputer Science
TopicComputer Graphics and Visualization Techniques
Canadian institutionsFuture Earth
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGaussianSegmentationViewpointsDeep learningGaussian filterGaussian processPattern recognition (psychology)Generative grammar

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Gaussian Splatting (GS), with its differentiable rasterization and anisotropic Gaussian primitive representation, has become a revolutionary technology for real-time, high-quality rendering. In recent years, artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as the principal catalyst underpinning GS’s rapid advances. This article reviews the progress of Gaussian Splatting, focusing on AI-driven Gaussian splatting applications. It systematically sorts out typical application cases of deep neural networks, generative models, and multimodal learning in artificial intelligence generated content, segmentation and understanding, and the interaction of embodied agents with the physical environment. This survey aims to help researchers quickly keep up with the development of Gaussian splatting and provide systematic reference and trend guidance for the technology integration and application expansion of AI-enabled GS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.980
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.005
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicComputer Graphics and Visualization TechniquesFrench-language works237,207