Learning Implicit Map Representations from Trajectories: An Enhanced Map-Free Framework for Motion Forecasting
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With the advancement of autonomous driving technology, trajectory prediction has become a critical task for ensuring traffic safety and intelligent decision-making. Existing motion forecasting models suffer from HD (High-Definition) map dependency, leading to high costs and poor adaptability. Furthermore, their accuracy sharply declines when maps are unavailable, motivating research into map-free alternatives. However, map-free models typically exhibit lower accuracy. To address this issue, we propose a universal enhancement framework that employs trajectory-map contrastive learning, utilizing a trajectory-to-map encoder to extract implicit map representations from raw trajectories, thereby improving performance. Extensive experiments on the Argoverse dataset demonstrate that, after incorporating our trajectory-to-map encoder into map-free models, the average minADE and minFDE are improved by 2.7% and 3.5%, respectively. These results underscore our method’s robustness and generalizability in enhancing map-free models, confirming the efficacy of implicit map representation learning and offering a promising solution for HD-map-free autonomous driving in dynamic open-road environments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".