MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

SQFE: A Scalable Quantum Feature Extraction Model for Deep Neural Networks

2025· article· W7125929953 on OpenAlexafffund
Sara Montajab, Henry Leung, Bhashyam Balaji

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldComputer Science
TopicQuantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
Canadian institutionsDefence Research and Development CanadaUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsConvolutional neural networkFeature extractionScalabilityQuantumDeep learningBackpropagationArtificial neural networkFeature (linguistics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have demonstrated strong performance in image processing tasks. However, as the complexity of the image scene increases, their ability to efficiently extract meaningful features diminishes. Quantum computing is increasingly recognized for its potential to address this limitation. We propose Scalable Quantum Feature Extraction (SQFE), a novel quantum feature extraction model designed as a variational quantum circuit (VQC) that mimics convolutional behavior while leveraging quantum principles. Unlike prior quantum feature extraction models that discard spatial features, use fixed quantum filters, or prevent joint optimization, SQFE supports full end-to-end training through backpropagation and is compatible with deep neural networks. SQFE is integrated into a ResNet-18 network to form the hybrid model QuRes. We evaluate multiple QuRes variants on a real-world dataset and demonstrate that QuRes models achieved test accuracies between 86.15% and 87.82%, outperforming the classical ResNet-18 with 84.84% accuracy. In terms of model complexity, QuRes reduced total parameter counts by 65%. These results highlight the potential of hybrid quantum-classical models to improve efficiency, scalability, and learning capacity in machine learning applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicQuantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureFrench-language works237,207