Latra: A Template-Based Language-Agnostic Transformation Framework for Effective Program Reduction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Essential for debugging compilers and interpreters, existing reduction tools face a fundamental trade-off. Language-Specific reducers, such as C-Reduce and ddSMT, offer highly effective reductions but require substantial engineering effort for each target language. Conversely, language-agnostic reducers, like Vulcan, sacrifice effectiveness for broad applicability.To bridge this gap, we present Latra, a novel template-based framework that balances both aspects, enabling general, effective, targeted program reduction. Latra combines language-agnostic reduction with user-defined, language-specific transformations. It facilitates user-defined transformations through a user-friendly domain-specific language based on simple matching and rewriting templates. This minimizes the need for deep formal grammar knowledge. Latra empowers users to tailor reductions to specific languages with reduced implementation overhead.Our evaluation shows that Latra significantly outperforms Vulcan. On average, it reduces 33.77% more tokens in C and 9.17% more tokens in SMT-LIB, with 32.27% faster execution in SMT-LIB. Notably, Latra closely matches the effectiveness of language-specific reducers, i.e., C-Reduce and ddSMT (89 vs. 85, 103 vs. 109 tokens on average), while significantly reducing engineering effort (167 vs. 5,685, 62 vs. 118 lines of code). We strongly believe that Latra provides a practical and cost-efficient approach to program reduction, effectively balancing language-specific effectiveness with language-agnostic generality.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".