MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7125939190 · doi:10.5604/01.3001.0055.5059

Treatment of facial nerve synkinesis with botulinum toxin. A systematic review

2025· article· W7125939190 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Zykov Valentyn, Aleksander Paweł Małkowski, Tetiana Zykova, Aleksandra Garbacik, Wiktor Antoni Niemczyk

Bibliographic record

VenuePolski Przegląd Otorynolaryngologiczny · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldMedicine
TopicFacial Nerve Paralysis Treatment and Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSynkinesisBotulinum toxinFacial nervePsychosocialAdverse effectPatient satisfactionMeta-analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction:Facial synkinesis is a common chronic complication of facial nerve palsy, caused by aberrant nerve regeneration and leading to involuntary co-contractions, hypertonicity, and psychosocial burden. Botulinum toxin type A (botox) is widely used to reduce synkinetic activity, yet protocols vary considerably. This systematic review evaluates the efficacy, safety, and clinical practices of botox for facial synkinesis.Methods: A search of PubMed, Embase, ScienceDirect, and Web of Science identified original English-language studies involving adult patients with facial synkinesis treated with botox. Exclusion criteria included reviews, case reports, abstracts, guidelines, protocols, and pediatric studies. Two reviewers independently performed study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale, with consensus from a third reviewer.Results: Forty-four studies (1994–2025; 1980 patients) were included. Synkinesis most commonly followed Bell’s palsy, Ramsay Hunt syndrome, or postoperative facial nerve injury. Botox dosing, injection sites, and guidance techniques varied widely, reflecting individualized treatment. Across studies, BoNT-A consistently improved synkinesis severity, facial symmetry, and quality-of-life metrics as assessed using scales such as Sunnybrook, House-Brackmann, SAQ, and FaCE. Benefits appeared within weeks and were maintained with repeated treatments. Adverse effects were mild and transient, including ptosis, dry eye, bruising, and temporary weakness, with no systemic complications reported.Conclusions: Botulinum toxin injection is an effective and safe therapy for facial synkinesis, improving both functional outcomes and patient-reported quality of life. However, heterogeneous protocols and outcome measures limit comparability. Future studies should implement standardized dosing strategies and validated assessment tools to support evidence-based treatment guidelines.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0070.006
Bibliometrics0.0050.007
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePolski Przegląd OtorynolaryngologicznySame topicFacial Nerve Paralysis Treatment and ResearchFrench-language works237,207