MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Collaborative LLM Inference over LEO Satellite Networks: Model Splitting and Pipeline Parallelism

2025· article· W7125942221 on OpenAlexaff
Songge Zhang, Wen Wu, Shaohua Wu, Weijie Yuan, Lingyang Song, Xuemin Sherman Shen

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicSatellite Communication Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInferencePipeline (software)Directed acyclic graphScheme (mathematics)MinificationPoint (geometry)GraphLow earth orbit

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we propose a collaborative large language model (LLM) inference scheme for low Earth orbit (LEO) satellite networks. Specifically, an entire LLM is split into multiple submodels deployed on each satellite, thereby enabling collaborative LLM inference via exchanging intermediate activations between satellites. In addition, the proposed scheme takes advantage of the pipeline parallelism mechanism that overlaps submodel inference with intermediate activation transmission, which can reduce LLM inference delay. Furthermore, we formulate an LLM inference delay minimization problem, which is transformed into a shortest-path search problem. To solve it, a directed acyclic graph (DAG)-based model splitting algorithm is developed, which restructures the DAG to identify the optimal model splitting point via an <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$A^{\star}$</tex>-based algorithm. Extensive simulation results demonstrate that the proposed scheme can reduce inference delay by up to 42 %, as compared to the state-of-the-art benchmarks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.874
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSatellite Communication SystemsFrench-language works237,207