MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7125947427 · doi:10.22054/ijer.2024.80110.1285

Estimation of the Vector Autoregressive Model with the Multivariate Skew Normal Distribution for the Shocks: Application to Two Real-World Datasets

2025· article· fa· W7125947427 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2025
Typearticle
Languagefa
FieldEngineering
TopicMilitary Technology and Strategies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAutoregressive modelMultivariate statisticsSkewnessSkewVector autoregressionSkew normal distributionKurtosisMultivariate normal distribution

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Modeling plays a crucial role in economic and financial research, forming the foundation for analysis, decision-making, policy development, and planning. Assumptions made during the modeling process are particularly important for estimation and forecasting, as they can significantly influence the results. One of the most widely used classical time series models is the autoregressive model, in which current values are expressed as a finite linear combination of past values. However, in real-world scenarios, many variables interact with each other. To capture these interdependencies, vector time series models-an important class of multivariate time series models-are employed. The vector autoregressive (VAR) models are commonly used in economic and financial modeling. VAR models are typically formulated assuming that the shocks (or noise terms) follow a normal distribution. However, in economic and financial contexts-particularly in macroeconomics-shocks do not often follow a symmetric distribution. The present article focused on a VAR model in which the shocks follow a multivariate skew normal (MSN) distribution. The expectation conditional maximization (ECM) algorithm were used to estimate the model parameters. Finally, using real-world datasets from Canada and Iran-where the shocks exhibit skewness-the study found that the VAR model with MSN-distributed shocks is more efficient than the VAR model with multivariate normal distribution for shocks.IntroductionThe multivariate normal distribution is commonly used to model shocks in VAR models. However, in fields such as economics, finance, the stock market, and medicine, various factors can introduce skewness (asymmetry) into the shocks, resulting in non-symmetric distributions. In such cases, the normal distribution becomes an inappropriate choice. To address this, the multivariate skew distribution-which accounts for asymmetry-should be used for modeling shocks. Despite its relevance, this approach has received limited attention in previous research. The family of multivariate skew distributions is broad and complex, posing practical challenges. The present study aimed to test the VAR model in which the shocks follow a multivariate skew normal (MSN) distribution, using the real-world datasets from Canada and Iran.Materials and MethodsConsider the VAR model of order p: where , o is location parameter, is the scale parameter, and S is the skew parameter. Its density function is given by: where , , , and denotes density function of MN, while denotes the standard cumulative distribution function.To find the maximum likelihood estimates of the parameters requires derivatives of the log-likelihood function; however, these derivatives do not have closed-form expressions. Therefore, they must be approximated using numerical methods. The maximum likelihood estimators were obtained via the expectation conditional maximization (ECM) algorithm. Based on the hierarchical representation of the multivariate skew normal distribution, we have:,(o, I),The logarithm of the conditional likelihood function in VAR(p) can be formulated as: where . The expectation of the logarithm of the conditional likelihood is denoted by , and the steps for the maximizing are as below:Step 1: Assuming no skewness, estimate the initial values for the coefficients and scale parameters.Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5: Repeat steps 2 to 5 until the convergence condition of the algorithm is established: Results and DiscussionThe performance of the proposed method was evaluated using two real-world datasets from Canada and Iran. The Dickey-Fuller test was employed to determine the stationarity of the data, while the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC), Hannan-Quinn Criterion (HQC), and Schwartz Bayesian Criterion (BIC) were used to select the order of the VAR model. The Canadian dataset consists of seasonally adjusted employment and unemployment data from 1980 to 2000. According to the Mardia test, the shocks follow a multivariate skew normal (MSN) distribution. Therefore, we estimated the parameters of the VAR(1) model. The AIC and BIC results are presented in Tables 1 and 2, respectively. Table 1. The Estimated Parameters of Model for Stationary Differenced Canadian DataEstimation 0.91030.7094 0.2139-.0149 -0.2018-0.4663 0.33030.0255 -0.0703 -0.1066 0.16460.1595 -0.09106-0.1003 0.09106-0.1003 0.114000.0977Table 2. The AIC and BIC for DataDistributionAICBIC-Log-Like 282.0266286.836139.011 260.6781265.4915128.339The collected data on agriculture, forestry, and fishing (AFF) and employment of women (EW) in Iran span the years 1991 to 2021. According to the Mardia test, the shocks follow a multivariate skew normal (MSN) distribution. The parameter estimates for the VAR(1) model, along with the AIC and BIC values, are presented in Table 3. Table 3. The Estimated Parameters of Model for Stationary Differenced Iranian DataEstimation -0.1104 --0.0798 1.23971.2267 0.27480.2836 0.27480.2836 0.38550.3796AIC146.1145145.9185BIC148.8491148.6531The fitted model can be formulated as follows: where and represent AFF and EW, respectively.According to the AIC and BIC criteria presented in Tables 2 and 3 for the Canadian and Iranian data, the VAR model with MSN-distributed shocks is more appropriate than the VAR model with MN-distributed shocks.ConclusionConsidering the VAR(p) model with shocks following a multivariate skew normal (MSN) distribution, the present study employed the maximum likelihood method and the ECM algorithm to estimate the model parameters. Based on two real-world datasets from Canada and Iran, the findings showed that the VAR model with MSN-distributed shocks provides a better fit than the model with MN shocks when the shocks exhibit skewness.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.042

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.081
GPT teacher head0.483
Teacher spread0.403 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)→Same topicMilitary Technology and Strategies→French-language works237,207→