MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

General-Purpose Programmable Photonic Circuit as an Ising Hamiltonian Computing Engine

2025· article· W7125953463 on OpenAlexaff
José Roberto Rausell‐Campo, Nayem Al Kayed, Bhavin R. Shastri, José Capmany Francoy

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldComputer Science
TopicQuantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersEuropean Research Council
KeywordsPhotonicsScalabilitySolverIsing modelSignal processingEmbeddingScheduling (production processes)ChipMatrix multiplication

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Photonic Ising machines exploit the intrinsic parallelism and ultrafast speeds of optical hardware to accelerate ground-state searches for combinatorial optimization. By embedding this functionality into a reconfigurable, general-purpose hexagonal-mesh photonic processor, we obtain a scalable platform capable to address diverse optimization tasks. We present a novel optoelectronic Ising solver in which the programmable photonic chip performs on-chip matrix multiplications to evaluate the Hamiltonian, while an electronic simulated-annealing loop drives iterative spin updates. As a proof of concept, we implement our architecture on the 72-unit-cell SmartLight processor and experimentally solve a three-node ferromagnetic coupling problem with external bias. To our knowledge, this constitutes the first demonstration of an Ising machine on a general-purpose hexagonal photonic mesh, paving the way for integrated photonic accelerators in optical computing and signal processing systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicQuantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureFrench-language works237,207