AI-Driven Predictive Models for Infrastructure Health Monitoring and Failure Prediction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
I would like to start my paper with a focus on a rising concern. The concern is related to the infrastructure industry, which faces challenges due to aging infrastructure, urbanization, and environmental pressures. While traditional maintenance methods rely on occasional maintenance checks, AI-based predictive models utilize machine learning and structural health monitoring (SHM) to provide a comprehensive solution, detecting errors and predicting failures. The failure to detect the errors is clearly seen in the I-35W bridge collapse of 2007. Our article will dive deep to know the potential of AI in improving the infrastructure reliability in bridges, dams, and buildings in the United States, India, and Canada. We will use six case studies, like as the Golden Gate Bridge, Tehri Dam, and ConfederationBridge, to study the results of monitoring time, maintenance costs, and safety incidents. We will study the data integration, environmental variability, and regulatory hurdles as key challenges. Along with this, technical advancements such as deep learning and digital twins are also studied, based on their scalability and adaptability. Our study also covers the global application of AI technologies in civil engineering. This will help us to know about the future developments of generative AI and the integration with Internet of Things (IoT) technology. These topics play a major role in sustainable and great infrastructure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".