Jürgen Habermas y Charles Taylor sobre el proyecto de la modernidad
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Los intercambios entre Charles Taylor y Jürgen Habermas en las últimas décadas han sido numerosos. Pese a los numerosos puntos de coincidencia, lo que los distingue, en última instancia, es el modo en el cual cada uno de ellos interpreta el advenimiento de la modernidad occidental. En este artículo damos cuenta de la posición habermasiana sobre este asunto en dos de sus obras capitales, y la crítica que articuló el filósofo canadiense sobre la misma. --- English version: The exchanges between Charles Taylor and Jürgen Habermas over the past decades have been numerous. Despite the many points of agreement, what ultimately distinguishes them is the way each interprets the advent of Western modernity. In this article, we examine Habermas’s position on this matter in two of his major works, as well as the critique articulated by the Canadian philosopher.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.034 | 0.031 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".