MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7125976166 · doi:10.17169/refubium-51028

341 Effect of perceived discrimination on health and healthcare utilization among international migrants in Europe – a systematic review

2025· article· en· W7125976166 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ms Susanne Bartig, Louise Biddle, Philippa Cumming, Andrea Marchitto, Elena Sommer

Bibliographic record

VenueRefubium (Universitätsbibliothek der Freien Universität Berlin) · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicMigration, Health and Trauma
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScale (ratio)Quarter (Canadian coin)Inclusion (mineral)Health careEmpirical researchDescriptive statisticsRefugeeMental healthHealth professionals

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OP 16: Exclusion and Discrimmination 2, B207 (FCSH), September 4, 2025, 13:30 - 14:30 Aims Research on the association between perceived discrimination and health-related outcomes stems largely from the US context. Discrimination is one of the major health challenges facing migrants and refugees in Europe, but it is unclear whether existing evidence is transferrable to a European context. This contribution aims to synthesize the empirical evidence on the effect of perceived discrimination in the post-migration phase on health and healthcare utilization among international migrants in Europe. Methods We conducted a systematic review (PROSPERO 2024 CRD42024508134) using PubMed, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, SSOAR for quantitative studies published from January 2000 to February 2024. The identified studies were independently screened by two researchers regarding previously defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Evidence was synthesized using descriptive statistics and a narrative approach for summarizing key results. Results The search yielded 11,093 records (8,828 after deduplication), with 134 articles remaining after the screening phase. Preliminary results show that the majority of studies (82%) addressed mental health and well-being, followed by physical health (21%) and self-rated health (16%). Just over a quarter (27%) of the studies measured perceived discrimination using a single item; the most commonly used scale was a single yes/no exposure (30%), followed by the Everyday Discrimination Scale (21%). The vast majority of studies are based on cross-sectional data, resulting in a lack of evidence of causal relationship between discrimination and health-related outcomes. Only 13% of the studies focused on refugees. The largest number of studies were conducted in Germany (23%), the Netherlands (22%), Spain (15%) and across multiple countries in Europe (12%). Conclusion The included studies provide evidence for negative effects of discrimination on mental and physical health among migrants in Europe. Nevertheless, further research is needed on causal mechanisms and outcomes other than mental health to inform appropriate policy intervention.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.482
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRefubium (Universitätsbibliothek der Freien Universität Berlin)Same topicMigration, Health and TraumaFrench-language works237,207