High-Frequency-Aware Graph Integration for Subcellular Spatial Transcriptomics
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recent advances in spatial transcriptomics have enabled subcellular-resolution profiling of gene expression, offering unprecedented opportunities to investigate intracellular architecture and local microenvironmental interactions. Graph neural networks (GNNs) have shown great promise in modeling spatial transcriptomics data. However, existing GNN-based methods primarily focus on low-frequency signals, overlooking high-frequency signals critical for resolving transcriptional differences across subcellular compartments and cell boundaries. This limits their ability to characterize fine-grained structural and functional heterogeneity within tissues, hindering accurate spatial domain identification. In this study, we propose HiFi-ST, a High-Frequency-Aware Graph Integration framework for subcellular spatial transcriptomics. HiFi-ST employs a high-pass filter to extract high-frequency transcriptional differences, which are then integrated with spatial contexts through a transformer-based architecture. A contrastive learning module is designed to enhance cell representation by aligning spatial organization with transcriptional heterogeneity. Comprehensive experiments on subcellular datasets demonstrated that HiFi-ST consistently outperformed six state-of-the-art methods in spatial clustering, gene expression enhancement, and niche identification.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".