Multi-View Interactive Interference Training Based on Cross-Network Uncertainty for Semi-Supervised Medical Image Segmentation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Consistency learning combined with pseudo label training is a mainstream paradigm in semi-supervised medical image segmentation (SSMIS), yet it faces two challenges: 1)The one-sided search and handling of uncertainty regions make it difficult to address complex uncertainty situations caused by multiple networks. 2)The premature reaching of consensus in traditional SSMIS frameworks hinders the information complementarity between sub-networks. To address these, we propose a multi-view interactive interference training framework based on cross-network uncertainty (MIICU). Specifically, we design a cross-network uncertainty region searching (CUS) module, which combines the predictions from two networks to provide more reasonable uncertainty regions. Then, we design a dual-decision complementary displacement (DCD) strategy that performs displacement operations on cross-network uncertainty regions in different scenarios, so as to facilitate the learning of these regions. We further propose a multi-view interactive interference training strategy by expanding the training environment with three different concatenation forms, encouraging information complementarity between sub-networks. Evaluation on the TN3K and ACDC datasets shows that our approach outperforms existing SSMIS methods and is comparable to fully supervised methods. Code has been released at GitHub
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".