Isabelle DAVION, Jerzy KLOCZOWSKI et Georges-Henri SOUTOU (dir.), La Pologne et l’Europe : du partage à l’élargissement (XVIII e -XXI e siècle), Paris, PUPS, 2007, 290 p.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le boycott politique des Jeux olympiques de MontréalUne double crise sans précédent vient perturber le bon déroulement des Jeux olympiques de 1976 à Montréal. La première débute le 17 mai 1976 entre le gouvernement canadien, le gouvernement communiste de Pékin et la République de Chine. Finalement la République de Chine se retire des Jeux. Quant à la seconde, elle se déroule quelques jours avant l’ouverture des Jeux. De nombreux Comités nationaux olympiques africains souhaitent boycotter les Jeux pour dénoncer la présence de la Nouvelle-Zélande qui a autorisé son équipe nationale de rugby à se rendre en Afrique du Sud. Trois éléments déterminants vont accélérer la décision prise par ces gouvernements africains de boycotter les Jeux : les élections en Nouvelle-Zélande, le massacre de Soweto et la réunion des ministres de l’Organisation de l’Unité africaine à l’île Maurice.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.010 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.006 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.024 | 0.017 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".