RIS-mounted UAV for Cell-Free ISAC Network: Joint Beamforming and Localization Optimization
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper considers the cell-free integrated sensing and communication (CF-ISAC) networks utilizing reconfigurable intelligent surface (RIS)-mounted unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). We aim to maximize the weighted sum rate by jointly optimizing access points (APs)’ transmit beamformings, RISs’ phase shifts, user-RIS association, and UAVs’ locations. Since the formulated problem is non-convex, it is decomposed into three subproblems. For optimizing APs’ transmit beamforming, RISs’ phase shifts and user-RIS association, we convert the log-sum problem into a quadratically constrained quadratic programming problem using the Lagrangian dual principle and multi-ratio fractional programming. For optimizing UAVs’ locations, the successive convex approximation technique is used to transform it into a convex problem. Simulation results highlight the considerable performance advantage of the proposed network compared to benchmark schemes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".