Morphology of Ranai City Natuna as the small island border city and sustainable development input
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Ranai Urban Area is the center and capital of the Natuna Regency, which is spread throughout the East Bunguran District. As the main service center in Natuna Regency, Ranai will directly affect the shape, structure, and environment of the city, as well as the surrounding rural areas. So that the types of forms and structures of the city can be identified during the process. The purpose of this research is to identify the shape and structure of the city of Ranai as an example of a small town in the area of small islands and the borders of Indonesia that has the potential to become a new growth center and has strategic value for the economy, security, and national defense, meanwhile still considering its sustainability for the future, especially in environmental dimension. The factors used to identify the form and structure of cities in this study are ecological and morphological approaches, which used spatial and descriptive qualitative analysis methods. The results of the study show that the shape of the Ranai Urban Area is a city that is not patterned. Spatial structures are sector models from north to east, and some of them have multicore structures from south to west.Furthermore, Ranai is more suitable for adopting the concept of green urbanism for further development, which aligns with the concept of sustainability.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".