Frederick M. Barnard, Herder on Nationality, Humanity and History, Montréal, McGill-Queen University Press, 2003, 185 p.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
RESUME Les attitudes des notaires parisiens lors des querelles jansénistes entre les années 1730 et les années 1770 montrent qu’il existe au sein de la bourgeoisie de la capitale de véritables pratiques d’expression politique et critique dans l’espace public. De significatives divergences de comportement professionnel apparaissent cependant. Certains notaires acceptent de mettre les actes de leur pratique au service de la cause des appelants de la bulle Unigenitus en enregistrant des témoignages de miracles ou des protestations contre la hiérarchie ecclésiastique. D’autres, plus prudents mais pourtant dévots jansénistes notoires, bornent leur engagement à l’appartenance à une communauté spirituelle plus ou moins informelle et au soutien privé à la cause des prêtres persécutés. Ce clivage reproduit globalement les différentes origines des notaires, les premiers plus liés aux milieux du droit, les seconds issus de la bonne marchandise parisienne. Ces contrastes sociaux persistent donc jusque dans l’exercice du métier.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.008 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.056 | 0.016 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".