MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7126203071 · doi:10.7202/1122286ar

Les risques psychosociaux dans le secteur communautaire : modèle de l’inertie systémique de la détresse psychologique

2025· article· fr· W7126203071 on OpenAlex
Ericka Chanel Faucher, Julie Cloutier

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueHumain et Organisation · 2025
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicResilience and Mental Health
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSyndemicResearch methodologyPublic policy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cette étude explore les mécanismes par lesquels les exigences du travail et les contraintes structurelles influencent la détresse psychologique des intervenantes d’organismes communautaires. Basée sur des entretiens semi-dirigés réalisés auprès de 12 intervenantes, notre analyse révèle un processus bidimensionnel où les exigences (quantitatives, qualitatives et émotionnelles) génèrent des tensions psychologiques et de la fatigue. Parallèlement, l’inertie systémique, conceptualisée comme l’insuffisance des contributions des bénéficiaires et partenaires externes, constitue une contrainte structurelle qui engendre un sentiment d’impuissance. Cette impuissance, associée à la frustration, à la colère et à la tristesse, s’inscrit dans une boucle délétère où la réitération des tâches amplifie l’exposition aux exigences du travail. Cette recherche enrichit les modèles théoriques existants en révélant des mécanismes spécifiques aux professions d’aide.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.624
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.414
Teacher spread0.374 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it