MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7126213869 · doi:10.26443/mje/rsem.v59i3.10156

Supervision de stage à distance en enseignement : mobiliser la présence cognitive à l’aide du numérique

2025· article· fr· W7126213869 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Matthieu Petit, Julie Babin, Marie-Ève Desrochers

Bibliographic record

VenueMcGill Journal of Education / Revue des sciences de l éducation de McGill · 2025
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCollaborative Teaching and Inclusion
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCognitionService (business)Continuing education

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dans les programmes de formation à l’enseignement, la supervision de stage peut se réaliser en ligne, tout en favorisant une présence à distance grâce aux dispositifs numériques, de nos jours incontournables. Or, comment les personnes superviseures universitaires (PSU) ajustent-elles leurs pratiques au service de la présence cognitive avec des cohortes de stagiaires en enseignement supervisé·e·s à l’aide du numérique? Quelques réponses émergent d’entretiens réalisés auprès de PSU du Québec. L’analyse thématique de leurs propos, notamment appuyée sur des indicateurs de présence cognitive, témoigne du fait que la médiatisation de la supervision peut favoriser la collaboration entre pairs, accentuer le rôle de médiateur des PSU (vers de plus hauts niveaux de cognition) et ouvrir des voies parallèles de soutien socioaffectif.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.105
Threshold uncertainty score0.209

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.149
GPT teacher head0.423
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMcGill Journal of Education / Revue des sciences de l éducation de McGillSame topicCollaborative Teaching and InclusionFrench-language works237,207