New Genre Arctic Art and Art Education Exhibition : Shifting River: You can’t Step Twice into the Same River, 2024
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The artwork combines feldwork in Canada, in the Yukon goldfelds along the Klondike River, and in Finnish Lapland on the banks of the Ounas River and its tributary, the Loukinen River. The lives of the Indigenous Han people who lived at the mouth of the Klondike River were changed radically during the time of the Klondike Gold Rush more than one hundred year ago. My home river, the Ounas, in North Finland, was protected by law in the early 1980s, but the Kittilä Gold Mine has now built a discharge pipe for mine’s wastewater into Loukinen, one of Ounas’s major tributaries. In my work, I examine the signifcance of the river, its meaning for local culture, current changes, and the future threats it faces. By the artwork I try to make visible the stories written on the surface of the water and deep under. I agreed with Heraclitus words: You can’t step twice in the same river
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.019 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.022 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".