MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7126361743

Doutoramento em Arquitetura 2024/2025. Escola de Arquitetura, Arte e Design da Universidade do Minho

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueRepositóriUM (Universidade do Minho) · 2025
Typebook
Language
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicArchitecture, Art, Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArchitectureUnit (ring theory)Quarter (Canadian coin)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Esta publicação colige as atividades desenvolvidas no Doutoramento em Arquitetura da Escola de Arquitetura, Arte e Design (EAAD) da UMinho durante o ano letivo de 2024/2025. O seu corpo central contém quinze sínteses (I) de trabalhos em curso, alguns conteúdos sobre as atividades letivas (II) organizadas no âmbito do Plano A, e informações sobre os dois eventos (III) que estabeleceram o início e fim do calendário curricular (com lugar nos dias 14 de fevereiro e 23 de maio de 2025). Além de um texto introdutório (com enquadramento e lançamento do propósito), esta publicação contém ainda um texto ensaístico sobre investigação desenvolvida e concluída no final de 2024 (no âmbito do Doutoramento em Arquitetura da EAAD) e, antes do fim, um pequeno epílogo (com caráter reflexivo sobre as ligações à unidade de I&D).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.449
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.004
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0040.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.002
Scholarly communication0.0090.002
Open science0.0040.001
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it