Doutoramento em Arquitetura 2024/2025. Escola de Arquitetura, Arte e Design da Universidade do Minho
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Esta publicação colige as atividades desenvolvidas no Doutoramento em Arquitetura da Escola de Arquitetura, Arte e Design (EAAD) da UMinho durante o ano letivo de 2024/2025. O seu corpo central contém quinze sínteses (I) de trabalhos em curso, alguns conteúdos sobre as atividades letivas (II) organizadas no âmbito do Plano A, e informações sobre os dois eventos (III) que estabeleceram o início e fim do calendário curricular (com lugar nos dias 14 de fevereiro e 23 de maio de 2025). Além de um texto introdutório (com enquadramento e lançamento do propósito), esta publicação contém ainda um texto ensaístico sobre investigação desenvolvida e concluída no final de 2024 (no âmbito do Doutoramento em Arquitetura da EAAD) e, antes do fim, um pequeno epílogo (com caráter reflexivo sobre as ligações à unidade de I&D).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.013 | 0.021 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.084 | 0.018 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".