Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This introduction to ‘Care-ful convening: Towards low carbon and inclusive knowledge sharing' outlines our hopes for this special issue, and introduces readers to a collection of authors who are expanding practices of convening with and through media. ‘Care, with and against’ (a phrase borrowed from M. Murphy) orients us towards ethical engagements amidst complex human and more-than-human entanglements. In contexts marked by unjust, carbon-intensive petrocultures, political violence and precarity, infrastructures of collective rejuvenation are essential. Towards that end, this introduction reflects on our ambitions to figure out how to think, communicate, and act differently in order to generate post-carbon, inclusive and multimodal approaches to convening. Through collaborative media projects and embodied conversations, we explore how extending care to ourselves, each other, and the planet can reshape the ways we gather, conduct research and form relationships.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it