Salud bucal en personas con condición de discapacidad relacionada con SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19): revisión de literatura
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: To describe the risk factors affecting oral health in people with disability related to SARS-CoV- 2 (COVID-19). Methods: A scoping review was performed during January 2022 in PubMed, Scielo and Google Scholar, taking articles referring to risk factors affecting people with disabling condition related to SARS-CoV 2 (COVID-19) in dentistry. The STROBE methods guide, the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) tool, as well as the PRISMA extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) were taken into account. Articles published from December 2019 to January 2022, in English and Spanish, were selected. Results: Eight articles were found, from different databases selected for this study. Of these articles, all 8 address the topics of oral health and disability. However, only one article included disability, oral health and SARS-CoV2 (COVID-19), describing socio-familial and environmental risk factors as risk factors. Conclusions: no relationship was observed between oral health, disability and COVID-19. Only one article reported that oral health is altered by stressful situations caused by the pandemic and the lack of knowledge about oral health care of parents and guardians as responsible for them.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.007 | 0.011 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it