Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This creative thesis is comprised of a novel-in-progress, which currently stands at approximately 72,000 words, representing approximately a quarter of a complete draft. The novel follows the foiling of a domestic terrorist plot during the 2016 election by a middle-aged mother and her teenage son, following them across the course of approximately a month as they fall in with two different, but interconnected, right-wing conspiratorial subcultures that lurk under the surface of their mid-Atlantic town. By navigating their own identities-in-crisis and resolving their strained relationship, they are able to stop chaos and destruction from taking full hold of their community. The first two chapters of the novel, which introduce the two main characters, are presented here. Additionally, a critical introduction seeks to place the creative work in context, both in terms of real-world social inspirations and with regard to previous literature which tackles both conspiracy as a subject, and the sincere, emotionally-driven, closely-observed style of the work.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it