MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7126736647

Research Paper for Australian Human Rights Commission (Disability Discrimination Commissioner): The Right of Persons with Disability to Inclusive Education

2024· other· en· W7126736647 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Trinayan Lahkar, Nurhati Tangging, Ciara Thatcher

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Sydney eScholarship Repository (The University of Sydney) · 2024
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConvention on the Rights of Persons with DisabilitiesHuman rightsCommissionMainstreamInclusion (mineral)Right to educationConventionInternational human rights law
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This report advocates for a fully inclusive education system in Australia, in line with international human rights law and the country’s obligations under the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD). Inclusive education integrates students of all abilities into mainstream classrooms, supported by systemic reforms to meet diverse needs. This approach upholds principles of equality, non-discrimination, and the United Nations’ goal of quality education for all. While countries like New Zealand and Canada have made significant progress, Australia remains behind in eliminating segregated schooling. The 2023 Royal Commission into Violence, Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation of People with Disability underscored the urgency of this transition, recommending the abolition of special schools by 2051. A phased, systematic approach is needed to address policy and operational barriers, ensuring a fully inclusive education system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.113
Threshold uncertainty score0.379

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0060.004
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0050.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1130.043

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Sydney eScholarship Repository (The University of Sydney)French-language works237,207