Rehabilitation in an 8-year old non-ambulatory tetraparetic Labrador retriever
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An 8-year-old male castrated Labrador Retriever presented with a history of non-ambulatory tetraparesis which progressed over approximately one and a half days. On presentation, the patient was bright, alert and responsive, with an unremarkable general physical examination. Neurological evaluation was consistent with an acute, non-painful, non-progressive, right-lateralizing Cl-CS myelopathy. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) revealed a focal, intramedullary hyperintense lesion on T2-weighted sequencing at the level of C6-C7. Based on the clinical history and MRI, the most likely diagnosis was a fibrocartilaginous embolism. The patient was hospitalized for 41 days to undergo intensive rehabilitation, which included passive range of motion, assisted standing and walking, use of a physioroll ball, gait training in a cart, and neuromuscular electrostimulation. On discharge, the patient was able to rise from a down unaided, stand on his own, and ambulate voluntarily. Physical therapy has benefits both in the area of neuroplasticity and preservation of the musculoskeletal system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".