Traumatic calcaneal tendon rupture in a 1 year old Labrador Retriever
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A 1 year old, male castrated Labrador Retriever presented to Cornell University Hospital for Animals Emergency Service in May of 2018 for an acute, non-weight bearing lameness and plantigrade stance of his left hind limb after being with other dogs at a dog boarding facility. A diagnosis of type IIc calcaneal tendon rupture was made based on presentation, palpation, and radiographs. Surgical repair of the tendon was performed using non-absorbable suture in a locking loop and three-loop pulley pattern, with placement of a calcaneotibial screw and bivalve cast. Calcaneal tendon rupture is the second most common tendinopathy in the dog. Several techniques exist to repair the tendon and promote its healing, all with a good prognoses for return to function. This report will discuss the diagnostics, presentation, surgical techniques, and aftercare of dogs with traumatic calcaneal tendon rupture.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.019 | 0.031 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".