MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7126885469

Use of a Free Skin Graft after Surgical Removal of a Tumor in a Dog

2019· other· en· W7126885469 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kati O'Donovan

Bibliographic record

VenueeCommons (Cornell University) · 2019
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHistopathologySoft tissue sarcomaSarcomaSoft tissueBiopsyWound closureSurgical excisionTumor surgery
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 9-year old, female spayed Labrador Retriever was presented to CUHA?s Soft Tissue Surgery Service with a previously diagnosed grade I soft tissue sarcoma (STS) on the mid-antebrachium. The tumor was first noted in January of 2019 and an incisional biopsy was performed by the primary care veterinarian. Histopathology was consistent with a grade I soft tissue sarcoma with incomplete margins. The patient had full staging with CUHA?s Oncology Service prior to her presentation; there was no evidence of metastasis. On presentation, the patient was bright, alert, and responsive with vital parameters within normal limits. A stable, well-defined and semi-movable 2.0 x 1.7 x 1.3 cm subcutaneous dermal mass was appreciated on the cranio-medial aspect of the right antebrachium. Several other historic lipomas were appreciated as well. The rest of the physical exam was unremarkable, and the patient was apparently systemically healthy. This seminar will discuss curative intent surgical excision of the tumor and subsequent use and post-operative care of a free skin graft with vacuum assisted closure (VAC) unit application.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.170 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeCommons (Cornell University)French-language works237,207