Salario mínimo como instrumento para alcanzar el pleno empleo en Colombia desde un enfoque post-keynesiano
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este trabajo busca estimar el monto del salario mínimo necesario para alcanzar el pleno empleo. Para ello se parte de una hipótesis post-keynesiana donde se entiende que el salario es un mecanismo macroeconómico que altera la demanda agregada en lugar de suponer que es un costo para la firma. Por lo cual se realiza un análisis econométrico bajo la modelación econométrica de Vector Error Correction (V.E.C) en EVIEWS para encontrar la relación entre el salario mínimo con el uso de la capacidad instalada y el Producto Interno Bruto (P.I.B). Prosiguiendo con el análisis económetrico metodológicamente se sigue la estimación del monto del salario mínimo mediante una regresión de mínimos cuadrados ordinarios (M.C.O) basada en la técnica simple de estimación de la tasa de crecimiento natural que planteó (Thirwall, 1969) y finalmente se ofrecen algunas conclusiones que se espera alimenten el debate sobre la negociación del salario mínimo en Colombia
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".