Análisis de conexiones viga – columna en una vivienda de dos pisos de hormigón armado diseñado según la NEC-SE-VIVIENDA 2015 mediante análisis numérico detallado con IDEA StatiCa
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El presente trabajo de investigación presenta un análisis de las conexiones viga - columna en estructuras de hormigón armado, diseñadas según los lineamientos de la NEC-SE-VIVIENDA: Viviendas de hasta 2 pisos con luces de hasta 5 metros. El primero se desarrolla empleando las secciones mínimas establecidas en el capítulo 2 de la norma, mientras que en el segundo se implementa las secciones del ejemplo desarrollado en la guía práctica, y el tercer modelo usando las secciones mínimas establecidas por la NEC-SE-HM: Estructuras de hormigón armado. El caso de estudio está ubicado en Ecuador, provincia de Pichincha dentro del Distrito Metropolitano de Quito. También se presenta un análisis comparativo entre los principales parámetros de tres diseños modelados en ETABS y los cálculos de conexiones viga - columna, tanto manuales como obtenidos mediante IDEA StatiCa, para verificar el cumplimiento de la norma NEC-SE-DS (2015).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".