MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7127050371 · doi:10.15640/rah.v12p3

Fall of a Democratic State in Afghanistan: An Analysis of Forced Deportation of Afghan Migrants from Pakistan

2024· article· W7127050371 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mohammad Toufeeq Shalizi, Rajesh Kumar, Kusum L Azad

Bibliographic record

VenueReview of Arts and Humanities · 2024
Typearticle
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPolitics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDeportationAfghanPersecutionRefugeeRepatriationTortureImprisonmentGovernment (linguistics)Politics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Due to fall of the government of Islamic republic of Afghanistan and control of the capital, Kabul, by the Taliban regime in 14 Agust 2021, most of the elite community included elected president Mohammad Ashraf Ghani left Kabul toward abroad to prevent concerns of persecution and torture. During the last four decades, millions of Afghan people fled to Pakistan, Iran, India and abroad due to political unrests and civil wars held in Afghanistan. Although, the dispersed refugees took asylum and later resettled in the destination countries as USA, Germany, Canada, Australia and European countries, but majority of them still remains as refugee due to lack of eligible criteria and required documents for the resettlement programs. Additionally, millions of the Afghan nationals displaced within the country and lost their near and dears during the internal conflicts. After the establishment of the government in 2001, estimated four million of Afghan refugees dispersed to Pakistan and Iran voluntarily repatriated back to Afghanistan. The willingly repatriation and rehabilitation program was assisted by the UNHCR and their stakeholders to bring cherish to immigrants’ life in their motherland. Latently, the government of Pakistan formed deportation policy and started forced deportation of millions of Afghan refugees following torture and imprisonment due to lack of legal residing documents. Likewise, thousands of the deported Afghan nationals are the part of previous government, and they face torture or persecution by the ruling regime back in Afghanistan. The paper focuses on the violation of international instruments for the protection of individuals done by the government of Pakistan, similarly analysis the forced deportation of millions of Afghan refugees from Pakistan, and portray the rehabilitation programs either in eastern or southern border part of Afghanistan implemented by the international communities with the collaboration of the government lead by the Islamic emirate in Afghanistan. The literature used for the present paper is based on secondary data include updated news related to deportation of Afghans from Pakistan, latest migration policies of government of Pakistan and published research articles, reports of international communities and government led by the Islamic emirate in Afghanistan on deportation and rehabilitation of afghan refugees from Pakistan.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.052
Threshold uncertainty score0.103

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReview of Arts and HumanitiesSame topicPolitics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle EastFrench-language works237,207