MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7127071286 · doi:10.18280/ijsse.151106

A Visual Cryptography Framework with Tuned Cipher Block Chaining and Quantum Key Distribution–Assisted Encryption for Securing Thermal Facial Biometrics in Anti-Doping Applications

2025· article· W7127071286 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
K. Komathi, D. Kavitha

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Safety and Security Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldComputer Science
TopicBiometric Identification and Security
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChainingEncryptionKey (lock)Block (permutation group theory)Block cipherCryptographyBiometricsTriple DES

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, Visual Cryptography (VC) is applied to the thermal images of players acquired in the sports field.The objective of VC is to protect players' information during a dope test done through thermal image analysis.VC transfers the thermal image in secured channel.The thermal image biomarker for a dope test is elevated skin temperature, asymmetrical heat patterns, excessive muscle heat retention, and abnormal recovery thermal signature.However, a major problem is the prevention of thermal images from the data breach, such as privacy violations, and the manipulation of doping assessments.To address the above problems, the player's thermal image is applied with VC with a quantum key algorithm and secures the player's identity.In the proposed method, the tampered thermal image is identified through the abnormal heat distribution in the player's face in the image.Initially, the thermal image is pre-processed using the Adaptive Histogram Equalization (AHE) and denoised using the Gaussian filter.Next, the image is divided into two secret shares, followed by the encryption and decryption process using the proposed Tuned Cipher Block Chaining with Quantum Key Distribution (TCBCQD) technique.The number of shares is decided by the TCBCQD technique.The number of shares is the tuning method in the proposed TCBCQD technique.Cryptographic-based access is done by the anti-doping agencies.The original image is deciphered after combining both the shares, which are available from the higher authorities.The image quality and security metrics were obtained.The proposed TCBCQD technique reconstructs the image with an accuracy rate of 98% and outperforms the existing methodologies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Safety and Security EngineeringSame topicBiometric Identification and SecurityFrench-language works237,207