MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7127107222 · doi:10.1080/00447471.2025.2599066

Documenting Anti-Asian Violence: Continuities and Crisis

2024· article· en· W7127107222 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Samuel Yoon

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerasia Journal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicIndian History and Philosophy
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
KeywordsImmigrationField (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article examines dominant narratives of anti-Asian violence to critique how the Asian American documentation of harm shapes and limits Asian American politicization. By analyzing two objects, the National Asian Pacific American Legal Consortium’s reports on anti-Asian violence (1993–2002) and the documentary Rising Against Asian Hate (2022), this article discusses how anti-Asian violence has been articulated and rearticulated during different moments of crisis. While seeming to reinforce the dominant understanding of anti-Asian violence as a scene of individual, spectacular, and repetitive injury, these two objects can also be read against the grain to offer a more expansive account of anti-Asian violence.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.902
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerasia JournalSame topicIndian History and PhilosophyFrench-language works237,207