MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Deciphering the Milky Way’s star formation at cosmic noon with high proper-motion stars

2025· article· en· W7127120998 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Deokkeun An, Young Sun Lee, Yutaka Hirai, Timothy C. Beers

Bibliographic record

VenueSpringer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology) · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGamma-ray bursts and supernovae
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of SciencesOffice of International Science and EngineeringAustralian Astronomical Optics-MacquarieJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceUniversity of Colorado BoulderInstituto de Astrofísica de CanariasOffice of ScienceMax-Planck-Institut für AstronomieMax-Planck-Institut für AstrophysikLawrence Berkeley National LaboratoryMinistry of Science and ICT, South KoreaNational Development and Reform CommissionMinistério da Ciência, Tecnologia e InovaçãoChinese Academy of SciencesUniversity of OxfordYork UniversityNew Mexico State UniversityNational Astronomical Observatory of JapanJoint Institute for Nuclear Astrophysics - Center for the Evolution of the ElementsLeibniz-GemeinschaftUniversity of Notre DameOhio State UniversityNational Research FoundationCarnegie Mellon UniversityUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de MéxicoAlfred P. Sloan FoundationUniversity of WashingtonJohns Hopkins UniversityUniversity of UtahCarnegie Institution of WashingtonNational Science FoundationU.S. Department of EnergySmithsonian InstitutionUniversity of PortsmouthVanderbilt UniversityYale University
KeywordsStarsMilky WayMetallicityStar formationGalaxy formation and evolutionGalaxyK-type main-sequence star

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Context. Evidence suggests that the Milky Way (MW) underwent a major collision with the Gaia–Sausage/Enceladus (GSE) dwarf galaxy around cosmic noon. While GSE has since been fully disrupted, it brought in ex situ stars and dynamically heated in situ stars into the halo. In addition, the gas-rich merger may have triggered a burst of in situ star formation, potentially giving rise to a chemically distinct stellar component. Aims. We investigated the region of phase space where stars formed during the GSE merger likely reside, and retain distinct chemical and dynamical signatures. Methods. Building on our previous investigation of metallicity ([Fe/H]) and vertical angular momentum (LZ) distributions, we analysed spectroscopic samples from GALAH, APOGEE, SDSS, and LAMOST, combined with Gaia kinematics. We focused on high proper-motion stars as effective tracers of the phase-space volume likely influenced by the GSE merger. To correct for selection effects, we incorporated metallicity estimates derived from SDSS and SMSS photometry. Results. Our analysis reveals that low-α stars with GSE-like kinematics exhibit bimodality in [Na/Fe] and [Al/Fe] at −1.0 ≲[Fe/H] ≲ −0.4. One group follows the low light-element abundances of GSE stars, while another exhibits enhanced values. These low-α, high-Na stars have eccentric orbits but are more confined to the inner MW. Eos overlaps with a high-eccentricity subset of these stars, implying that it constitutes a smaller structure nested within the broader population. After correcting for sampling biases, we estimated a population ratio of approximately 1:10 between the low-α, high-Na stars and the GSE debris. Conclusions. These results suggest that the low-α, high-Na stars formed in a compact region, likely fuelled by gas from the GSE progenitor, analogous to clumpy star-forming clouds seen in high-redshift galaxies. Such stars may trace the first sparks of more extensive merger-driven starburst activity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSpringer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)Same topicGamma-ray bursts and supernovaeFrench-language works237,207