MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7127183001 · doi:10.18357/wg22201640

Sustainable Suburban Development in British Columbia

2016· article· W7127183001 on OpenAlexaffabout
Katherine A. Janota-Bzowska

Bibliographic record

VenueWestern Geography · 2016
Typearticle
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCollaborative and Sustainable Housing Initiatives
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSustainable developmentUrbanismUrban planningSustainabilityNew Urbanism

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For the past few decades, the principles of sustainable development have become a crucial part in the planning and managing of development projects in the globally built environment. Today, nearly every new development project declares some sense of “sustainability”, but what does it truly mean to be sustainable? Westhills, in the City of Langford, and Partington Creek, in the City of Coquitlam, are two primary examples of development projects in British Columbia that are truly sustainable; these Master Planned Communities follow New Urbanist principles, and have been designed to reduce sprawl, produced compact and socially diverse homes, and are pedestrian-orientated settlements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.042
Threshold uncertainty score0.302

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0080.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWestern GeographySame topicCollaborative and Sustainable Housing InitiativesFrench-language works237,207