ETHNOMATHEMATICS: EXPLORATION OF GEOMETRY CONCEPTS IN TIBAN MOSQUE ARCHITECTURE
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ethnomathematics is an event for learning education and culture because the connection between education and culture cannot be separated. Research This aims for a geometry draft in the Tiban Mosque, Malang architecture, which can be used as a medium for understanding draft geometry. Research This is implemented qualitatively with an approach to ethnography. The instrument's central Study is the researcher itself. Data was collected using technique studies library, observation, interviews, and documentation. Informants in Study This is an inhabitant of the Tiban Mosque; students at the time were officers who provided information and one of the craftsman ornaments. Based on the results, the Study found that the draft gets up flat, builds space, and transforms geometry. The concept gets up flat found , among others, square, square length, circle, rhombus, right-angled trapezoid, triangle on the same side, quarter circle, and half circle. Concept get up space found including cones, blocks, cylinders, and spheres. The concept of transformation geometry included reflection, dilation, translation, and rotation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".