INTEGRATING PSYCHOLOGICAL CARE TO IMPROVE OUTCOMES IN PEDIATRIC ATOPIC DERMATITIS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Atopic Dermatitis (AD) substantially reduces the quality of life (QOL) in affected children due to visible skin lesions and persistent pruritus, while caregivers experience considerable psychological stress. This review analyzed six randomized controlled trials evaluating nonchemical interventions aimed at improving QOL and disease severity in pediatric AD patients. Interventions primarily included educational programs, with one study assessing the effect of viewing humorous films on sleep quality. Results indicated that educational interventions generally reduced disease severity compared to no education. Nurse-led clinics were more effective than dermatologist-led clinics, and video-based parental education outperformed direct teaching. Additionally, viewing humorous films before bedtime decreased night-time awakenings. Methodological limitations were identified in four studies, which may affect the strength of these conclusions. Rigorous, well-designed trials are needed to validate these findings and establish replicable intervention strategies. Overall, educational and behavioral interventions show promise for improving QOL and managing disease severity in children with AD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".