Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
En aquesta comunicació s’analitzen els dos textos, en l’original alemany, en els quals Herder reflexiona sobre la idea d’una nova mitologia: Del nou ús de la mitologia (1767), i Iduna, o la poma del rejoveniment (1796). Explico com en el primer assaig l’autor presenta les característiques principals del que ell anomena «ús heurístic » o «nou ús» de la mitologia; i com en el segon mostra que també l’estudi dels mites nòrdics ens pot proporcionar nous elements per crear una poesia imaginativa. Comparant aquests dos textos, podrem valorar l’aportació de Herder a un tema rellevant en la història de l’estètica, i entendre millor el seu desenvolupament posterior en pensadors del primer Romanticisme alemany com són Hölderlin, Friedrich Schlegel i Schelling.Paraules clau: Herder, nova mitologia, poesia, estètica, Romanticisme.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it