Bibliographic record
Abstract
A duality-driven research-creation project, Elysium reinterprets Toronto’s rental housing crisis through the parodical-critical framework of Linda Hutcheon’s recontextualization of Mikhail Bakhtin’s concept of Double-Voiced Discourse. Drawing from James C. Scott’s theory of Everyday Resistance, I argue parody is an effective tactic of everyday resistance, challenging the systemic erasure of tenant experiences in the rental housing search. In twofold forms of cute-countercultural design and autoethnographic-satire, Elysium operates within dissonance, absurdity, and the prevalent Gen Z phenomenon of “trinket culture,” an aesthetic of affective nostalgia, as a visual strategy for social engagement. Elysian Friends, a series of fictitious mascots, function as representational communicative agents, utilized across lowbrow mediums as an entry-point to encourage solidarity among women aged 18-28. Elysium proposes an alternative method to how tenants engage with housing culture, whilst establishing a critical commentary on the exclusion of women-identified media in housing and design research.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.009 | 0.008 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.010 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".