Bibliographic record
Abstract
Insulin – a naturally occurring hormone produced by beta cells in the pancreas, has been successfully isolated and purified in the year 1921 by the scientists Banting and Best in Toronto. Since then, more than 100 years later, different formulations and delivery methods have been developed. Type 1 diabetes depends on insulin for survival and reduced morbidity. Therefore, it came naturally with time to research newer technologies that mimic as much as possible the job of the pancreatic beta cells to provide insulin. This led to the development of the first model of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion in the 1970s. Several advantages have been linked to the insulin pump as opposed to multiple daily insulin injections. Literature mentions better glycaemic outcomes with increased time in range and reduced hypoglycaemic episodes with insulin pumps. Other benefits vary from practical and psychological benefits with regards to the changing mentality towards living with type 1 diabetes, to long-term benefits involving the reduction of micro- and macrovascular complications. Studies are still being conducted to determine whether type 2 diabetic patients could also benefit from such insulin pumps.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".